In a practice that lasted in Switzerland until 1981,
tens of thousands of children and teenagers were forcibly removed from their families, who for one reason or another were deemed by the authorities to be incapable of caring for them.
It is a chapter in Swiss history
that has left painful scars. Now victims of these measures have been invited to a “ceremony of commemoration” in Bern on Thursday.
“I was born without a father and my mother gave me to my grandmother to look after. When my grandmother died, they placed me with the sisters and then with a farmer. I had to milk the cows before going to school and he treated me very harshly. I was nobody,” Paul Stutzmann recalls.
He later went on to become a craftsman specializing in windows, including stained glass. In addition to having six children of their own, Stutzmann and his wife took in two more from a relative who was unable to care for them.
Now 72, Stutzmann was one of an estimated 100,000 children subjected to the policy in the 19th and 20th centuries.
Effectively a cheap labor force,
the children were sometimes beaten, malnourished, or sexually abused. For their part, unmarried teenage mothers and dropouts could be detained without trial or interned in psychiatric hospitals right up until the 1980s. The authorities sometimes even decreed that the adults should be castrated or sterilized and forced to hand their children over for adoption.
In the early 2000s, survivors’ accounts began to appear in the media, triggering questions in parliament. For a long time, the churches, cantons, communes, and government all blamed each other – some even playing down the mistreatment suffered by the
children.
.The situation began to change in 2010 when, following heavy lobbying, women who had been detained without trial in the Hindelbank prison in Canton Bern obtained an official apology from federal and cantonal authorities.
This week’s historic commemoration, to be attended by Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga, will for the first time bring together all those involved in the policy including representatives from the institutions, churches, cantons, towns, and the Swiss Farmers’ Union. Former federal parliamentarian Hansruedi Stadler has been nominated by the minister to mediate future discussions between the victims and institutions.
Too ashamed or too painful
“At the time, it was normal to mistreat the children, and poverty was considered a flaw to be corrected with hard work. I was invited one day to a meeting of these people and I was so completely shocked by what they said that I was speechless,” says Walter Zwahlen, president of the Association for Stolen Children.It is estimated that around 10,000 of these children are still alive but Zwahlen’s association has only about 40 members.
“Many are too ashamed to come forward and it is too painful to reopen the old wounds,” he says.
Because the archives of these events are dispersed between the cantons, communes, and institutions, or have even been destroyed, there has not yet been a national study undertaken of the practice. As a result, oral testimony is practically the only reliable source to document what happened. Nevertheless, Zwahlen has developed a unique library of 620 books of testimony from a range of countries where similar practices were carried out.
“It was the same elsewhere,” he explains. “There is just as little documentation as in Switzerland but the witness accounts are the same from Germany to Poland to Czechoslovakia or Norway.”
Years of pressure
“We can no longer ignore the fact that it happened. Many families have members who were farmed out,” says researcher Pierre Avvanzino, a former professor in the social work division at the University of Applied Sciences in Lausanne.
“In 1987, the travelers’ children taken from their parents were rehabilitated and received compensation. This was easy because the ‘children of the road’ program [1926-1973] was mandated at a federal level. The archives were centralized so that it was impossible for the government to avoid either apologizing or providing compensation!”
For the children who were forced to work on farms or and those detained without trial, it took years of pressure – including hunger strikes, appeals to the European Court of Human Rights, and a traveling exhibition which began in Switzerland in 2009 – before a few cantons (Bern, Lucerne, Thurgau, and Fribourg) issued apologies for past practices.
Two parliamentary initiatives are now calling for moral reparation and the launch of a national research program. But the question of financial compensation is off the table for the right-wing parties and for most of the members of the judicial committee of the House of Representatives.
The billion franc disagreement
An economist from a large bank, working with the daily tabloid Blick, recently calculated that “the unpaid labor of children was worth between CHF20-65 billion to the agriculture industry. Some 10,000 children still alive should be eligible for around CHF1.2 billion ($1.6 billion).”
For Zwahlen, it’s a realistic figure, but while the Swiss Farmers Union has acknowledged “this dark chapter in Swiss history”, it rejects both the idea of an apology or compensation.
“It’s difficult, even impossible, after so many years, to fix an amount and any lump sum compensation could not take into account the conditions of the children which were different from case to case,” says union president Jacques Bourgeois.
Advancing is also skeptical: “It would take a lot of political pressure, something I don’t see for the moment. Only a few people see it as an issue. The historical facts are still too disputed and, in my opinion, these children don’t count for anything for politicians. But if we want to do something, it has to be done quickly because these people are dying off.”
So will Stutzmann go to Bern on Thursday?
“I don’t think I have the nerve. And then, I’ve had a good life. For me, all this is in the past, it’s over and done with,” he says somewhat hesitantly.
Isabelle Eichenberger, swissinfo.ch
