To understand the USA,
it’s necessary to grasp one thing concerning the Institution.
Most citizens don’t realize it exists. Yet the institution makes its influence felt from the President’s cabinet to the calling of a young schoolteacher who desires a foundation grant. It affects the nation’s policies in almost every area of government.
— The News & Courier, Charleston, S.C.
That 1961 news story outlined the institution like this:
The institution may be a general term for those individuals in finance, business, and the professions… who hold the principal measure of power and influence in this country irrespective of what party occupies the White House.
You’re unhappy with it, maybe even fed up. But you cannot quite place your finger on what “it” is. “The system”? “Debt”? “Banksters”? “Corporatism”? “Corruption”? It’s very tough to identify and to describe. It’s like being asked to define the “Kingdom of God,” or to define “justice.” Both these things are very difficult, if not impossible, to do.
Indeed, there are multiple world religions —
and sub-sets of those religions — trying to identify and describe and define God. We still, and always will fight wars over it. Same for defining “justice,” which has led to one of the most respected professions in this world: lawyers and judges.
Yes, it’s hard to pinpoint the so-called Institution. But it’s not arduous to visualize its real-world consequences and implications.
The News & Courier put it like this:
The Institution is a block of power and opinion…
An Institution man can be as liberal as Walter Reuther and as conservative as Dwight D. Eisenhower was. This is the vary of thought and action at intervals in which the institution operates. The institution is FOR aid, for integration, and for that bundle of sentimental internationalist policies common to the Harry Truman, Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations. It is a loose operating alliance of the near-socialist faculty members and also the internationalist Eastern banker. The institution controls the good foundations that support analysis and graduate study. Thus, it is able to determine the direction of thinking in many of the nation’s universities.
Thus, it controls the ways in which future leaders of business, finance, and politics are being tutored. It holds influence over the philosophies, thought processes, and rationales they’re going to use to assess this planet… make decisions about it, justify those decisions, and convince others they’re absolutely right.
It would take many pages to list the top positions held by Institution alum, from the heads of government agencies to the corner offices of banks, media, retail, consumer goods, manufacturing, agriculture, or any other industry you can name. And sometimes they do a switch.
It’s important to identify what the Institution
is and what its goals are. As you’ll see, they hold the highest roles in business and government, and so they determine rules, laws, and processes that affect and limit you in everyday life. They grasp them within and out, and they operate on both sides — sometimes the regulator, sometimes the regulated. And it’s tough to mess up because there’s no script; they make it up and change it as they go (bail out banks, make corporations people, ban short selling, etc.).
They’re also in controlling positions
in media on both sides of the political spectrum, which polish it all over and serve it to us in digestible little bites so it’s easier to swallow. That’s how a payroll tax increase on every American gets branded as a “Fiscal Cliff deal.” Some deal… (Next, they’re going to make sequestration sound like it’s bad for you so they can give more money to their friends.)
This has been acknowledged by respected Anti-Establishment scholars, historians, and politicians for years.
Harvard alum, Georgetown history professor, and Bill Clinton mentor Carroll Quigley wrote in 1981 that the goal of the Institution was “to unite the world, and above all the English-speaking world, in a very federal structure,” and that “this goal could best be achieved by a secret band of men united to one another by devotion to the common cause, and by personal loyalty to one another. Both felt that this band ought to pursue its goal by secret political, and economic influence behind the scenes, and by the control of journalistic, educational, and propaganda agencies…”
Democratic Congressman and 1980 presidential candidate John R. Rarick warned the institution is “dedicated to a one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education, and mass communication media… Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from higher than, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high-level decisions for converting the U.S. from the sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship. Its main goal continues to be to make a one-world government by destroying the liberty and independence of all nations, especially the United States.”
Rear Admiral Chester Ward wrote,
“The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. The second circle of international members within the CFR contains the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they need the planet banking monopoly from no matter power finishes up within the management of worldwide government.”
And Pat Oscar Robertson all over in 1991: “The goals of the institution square measure somewhat strange… At the central core is a belief in the superiority of their own skill to form a world system within which enlightened noncompetitive market economy will bring all of the varied currencies, banking systems, credit, producing, and raw materials into one government-supervised whole, policed in fact by their own world army.”
It’s about controlling the world’s money supply — and controlling you in the process.
This is not Left vs. Right or Conservative vs. Liberal; it is Institution vs. Anti-Institution.
| Person | Position | Alma mater |
| Barack Obama | U.S. President | Columbia / Harvard |
| Mitt Romney | Presidential Contender, Governor | Harvard |
| George W. Bush | Governor, U.S. President | Yale / Harvard |
| Ben Bernanke | Federal Reserve Chairman | MIT / Harvard |
| Timothy Geithner | Secretary of the Treasury | Dartmouth / Johns Hopkins |
| Hank Paulson | Former Secretary of the Treasury, Current Investment Banker | Dartmouth / Harvard |
| Lloyd Blankfein | Chairman & CEO of Goldman Sachs | Harvard |
| Jeffrey Immelt | Chairman & CEO of GE | Dartmouth / Harvard |
| David G. Bradley | Owner of Atlantic Media Company (The Atlantic, National Journal) | Harvard / Georgetown |
| Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. | Chairman & Publisher of The New York Times | Tufts / Harvard |
